Warren Buffett
93% Profile Match
Bain News Service, Library of Congress, George Grantham Bain Collection (ggbain.05767); photographer not credited; date not recorded (before the mid-1920s) · Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, George Grantham Bain Collection, glass negative captioned 'Justice O.W. Holmes', digitised as ggbain.05767 and hosted on Wikimedia Commons: publisher Bain News Service, photographer not credited, no date recorded; the Bain collection runs from about 1900 to the early 1920s, so the negative predates 1925 and shows Holmes during his Supreme Court service. The Library states no known restrictions on publication for the Bain collection and the Commons page quotes that statement; the Library's own item page could not be opened (bot protection, HTTP 403), so the statement was verified through Commons. Original 4147 x 5766; downscaled once to 863 x 1200 (no upscaling). The Wikidata image (Harris & Ewing, c. 1930, edited copy of a Library of Congress film negative) was not used because the Bain image has a clearer pre-1925 basis. · Public domain (US); Library of Congress: no known restrictions on publication
jurist · 20th Century
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
1841–1935
Known For
socialhistoricalcultural
Not yet included in personality matching — the documented evidence doesn't yet cover enough of the personality model. Everything else on this page is fully available.
Trait Constellation
Key Achievements
Published The Common Law in 1881, arguing that 'the life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience' and that law grows with society rather than following formal axioms.
Served about twenty years on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, then on the US Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932, known for short, quotable opinions and for deference to elected legislatures.
Wrote the 1919 Schenck opinion stating the 'clear and present danger' test, and the Lochner (1905) and Abrams (1919) dissents, the latter urging a 'free trade in ideas'.
Moments That Reveal Them
In his Lochner dissent Holmes wrote that the case rested on an economic theory the country did not share, and that his own agreement or disagreement had nothing to do with a majority's right to embody its opinions in law.
This is consistent with dissenting from a court majority on a stated principle of judicial method rather than personal preference. Independent Thinking
Cotter reports that Holmes's 1904 Northern Securities dissent, his first written dissent, permanently strained his relationship with Theodore Roosevelt, who had nominated him.
This is consistent with dissenting even when it cost a relationship with the president who appointed him. Conflict Tolerance
Turning Points
In 1882 Holmes left a newly won Harvard Law professorship, without advance notice to the faculty, to accept a seat on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, a move Oyez links to his finding academic life incomplete.
This is consistent with preferring the practice of judging over an academic career. Mastery Orientation
Similar People
People whose overall profiles resemble theirs.
Rosalind Franklin
90% Profile Match
Martha Graham
88% Profile Match
Carl Jung
88% Profile Match
Marie Curie
87% Profile Match
Bertrand Russell
87% Profile Match
Opposite Profile
Not a rival — a different profile shape worth a look.
Harriet Tubman
20% Profile Match
Sources
- Oliver Wendell Holmes (Q360574) -- verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-24): English label 'Oliver Wendell Holmes', description 'American jurist (1841-1935); US Supreme Court justice from 1902 to 1932', born 1841-03-08, died 1935-03-06, citizenship United States, Korean label '올리버 웬들 홈스 2세', P18 image 'Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930.jpg'. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Oyez (Chicago-Kent College of Law / Cornell LII / Justia), biography of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (via the Oyez people API), read in full: Harvard class poet, Massachusetts infantry officer wounded three times, Harvard Law, teaching and writing, The Common Law published at 40, twenty years on the Massachusetts Supreme Court, 1902 nomination by Theodore Roosevelt confirmed without objection, service on the Fuller, White, Taft and Hughes Courts, a pragmatic view of law balanced against scepticism of human nature, short opinions studded with vivid phrases, a daily walk of about two and a half miles to Court, and missed no session in 25 of his 29 years. CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE. Institutional biography, admiring in tone.
- Daniel A. Cotter, 'Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1841-1935): The Oldest Justice at Retirement from the Supreme Court' (Constituting America, 2017), read in full: The Common Law (1881) describing common law as evolving with society and rejecting formalist theories, The Path of the Law (1897), appointment to the Massachusetts court and Harvard friction, Otis v. Parker as his first Supreme Court opinion, Schenck (1919), 'Great Dissenter' with only 72 separate dissents against almost 900 majority opinions, the Lochner and Abrams dissents, the 1904 Northern Securities dissent that permanently strained his relationship with President Roosevelt, more opinions for the Court than any other justice of his era, a deference to states as arenas of experiment that produced apparent inconsistency between Schenck and Abrams, and the Buck v. Bell opinion described as harsh and infamous. Lawyer-author's essay combining praise and criticism, written for a civic-education site; the author states the opinions are his own.
- Biography.com, 'Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.' (biography.com), read in full: Civil War service, Harvard Law, American Law Review editorship 1870-1873, The Common Law in 1881, Massachusetts Supreme Court from 1883 and chief justice from 1899, appointment in 1902, 'the Great Dissenter' for opposing his fellow justices, Lochner dissent, Schenck and the 'clear and present danger' test, the Abrams dissent and the 'free trade in ideas' passage, and retirement in January 1932. Contains an inconsistent retirement year (1931 in its summary, January 1932 in its body); the body date, which agrees with Oyez-linked and other sources, is used. General-audience biography.
- Harvard Gazette, 'Lessons in an unappealing law' (news.harvard.edu, October 2013), read in full: a Harvard seminar led by Professor Noah Feldman on Buck v. Bell (1927), calling Holmes 'one of the greatest justices of all time' but the case 'not a case about which to be terribly proud', noting that only the constitutional question and not the facts were before the Court, the 8-1 decision, Holmes's almost humorous tone and 'a confidence in his own superiority', the contemporary view of eugenics as progressive, and the decision never having been overturned. University news report on a scholar's assessment; used only to document the Buck v. Bell episode and its critical reception, not to score any trait.
- University of Illinois Law Review Online, 'Disenchanting Justice Holmes' (2021, 2021 U. Ill. L. Rev. Online 330), read in full: a law-student author's advocacy essay arguing the Buck v. Bell opinion was legally unsupported (five paragraphs, one case cited, disregard of earlier state-court decisions striking sterilisation laws, the vaccination analogy to Jacobson v. Massachusetts, mistaken facts about Carrie Buck and her family) and urging institutions to stop venerating Holmes, relying on scholarship by Nourse, Siegel and Lombardo. Adversarial, one-sided and evaluative; used only as the counter-voice on the Buck v. Bell opinion, never as a source of personality claims.
- Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), text of the Court's opinion and Justice Holmes's dissent (Cornell Legal Information Institute), dissent read in full: that the case 'is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain', that his 'agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law', and that 'the 14th Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics'. A primary legal text: the documented judicial work, not an outside account of his behaviour.
- Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919), Justice Holmes's dissent (Cornell Legal Information Institute), dissent passages read: that the ultimate good is better reached by 'free trade in ideas', that the Constitution is 'an experiment, as all life is an experiment', that courts should be 'eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe' unless they imminently threaten immediate interference with the lawful purposes of the law, and his reading of the Sedition Act history. A primary legal text; documented judicial work.
- Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), opinion of the Court by Justice Holmes (Cornell Legal Information Institute), read in full (five short paragraphs): upholding a Virginia compulsory sterilisation statute against due process and equal protection challenges by reference to the statute's procedural safeguards and the compulsory vaccination precedent Jacobson v. Massachusetts, ending with the sentence 'Three generations of imbeciles are enough.' A primary legal text, documented as a controversial episode; it is NOT used as evidence for any trait row (see provenance notes).
- Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., 'The Common Law' (1881), Project Gutenberg eBook 2449, opening passages of Lecture I read: the statement that 'the life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience', with the felt necessities of the time and judges' own prejudices said to shape the law more than the syllogism, and the argument that law embodies a nation's development and cannot be treated like mathematics. His own published work: documented authorship, used for the scope of the book and not as outside corroboration of his character.
- Wikimedia Commons file page 'Justice O.W. Holmes LCCN2014685760.jpg' (wikitext and image record), checked for the portrait: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, George Grantham Bain Collection glass negative captioned 'Justice O.W. Holmes', publisher Bain News Service, photographer not credited, no date recorded; the file page quotes the Library's statement of no known restrictions on publication. Original 4147 x 5766. Not used for any scoring.