

Gérard Edelinck, portrait of Blaise Pascal after François II Quesnel, engraving, c.1691; Clermont Auvergne Métropole, Bibliothèque du patrimoine (GRA 6025); reproduction CC BY-SA 4.0; cropped and downscaled · Gérard Edelinck, copper engraving after François II Quesnel, c.1689-1692 (probably 1691), Bibliothèque du Patrimoine de Clermont Auvergne Métropole (GRA 6025), via Wikimedia Commons (cropped scan) · Public domain (17th-century engraving); library reproduction released under CC BY-SA 4.0
Trait Constellation
Key Achievements
In the summer of 1654 Pascal and Pierre de Fermat exchanged letters on how to divide the stakes of a gambling game interrupted before its end, solving the problem by different methods; mathematicians date the beginning of probability theory to this correspondence. The same year Pascal wrote his Treatise on the Arithmetical Triangle, a systematic study of the table of binomial coefficients that now bears his name, using a form of proof by induction. It was published only after his death, and the triangle itself, known in earlier traditions, was not his invention.
In 1646-47 Pascal took up Torricelli's mercury-barometer experiment and published his New Experiments Concerning the Vacuum; in November 1647 he asked his brother-in-law Florin Périer to test on the Puy de Dôme whether the effects blamed on nature's horror of a vacuum came instead from the weight of the air, and on 19 September 1648 Périer found the mercury about three inches lower at the summit than at the base. His Treatise on the Equilibrium of Liquids, written in the early 1650s and published after his death, sets out the principle of fluid pressure now called Pascal's law, and the SI unit of pressure bears his name. Descartes and others accepted the readings but disputed that the space above the mercury was a true vacuum.
From 1642 Pascal worked on an arithmetical machine, now called the Pascaline, a brass-and-ebony adding and subtracting machine with automatic carry. His own letter and the royal privilege of 1649 say he built more than fifty different models before settling on one, and about eight of the original machines survive. It was not the first calculating machine, since Wilhelm Schickard built one in 1624, and Pascal's sold poorly and went out of production around 1652.
Between January 1656 and March 1657 Pascal published eighteen anonymous open letters, the Provincial Letters, defending the theologian Antoine Arnauld against censure by the Sorbonne and then attacking the moral teaching of the Jesuits, in lively French meant for general readers rather than scholars' Latin. They circulated widely, were condemned in Rome in 1657, and later critics, even one who faulted his method, called them a masterpiece of French prose. His unfinished notes for a defence of Christianity, the Pensées, were published after his death in 1670 and include the argument known as Pascal's wager.
Moments That Reveal Them
In the 1645 dedication of his arithmetical machine to Chancellor Séguier, Pascal wrote that artisans could not build what he had designed, and that after a Rouen clockmaker made a useless imitation he dismissed all his workmen and resolved to abandon the project. At the Chancellor's urging he resumed work on the machine.
This offers one example of the profile's persistence: a documented near-abandonment and restart over several years, although the account of it comes mostly from Pascal's own letter. Persistence
In January 1656, when Arnauld's own written defence left his friends at Port-Royal unmoved, Arnauld turned to Pascal and said that he, being young, ought to do something; the next day Pascal brought the first Letter, and Arnauld ordered it printed. Nicole, who helped revise the series, is reported to have said that Pascal often spent as long as twenty days on a single letter and rewrote some of them seven or eight times, while the sixteenth letter apologises for its length because he 'had no leisure to make it shorter'.
This is consistent with the profile's persuasiveness: the first Letter was written for readers whom Arnauld's technical paper had not reached, and the revision effort reported by Nicole points to care over how each one would be read. Persuasiveness
Turning Points
In late 1654 Pascal's work changed direction. After a night of religious experience on 23 November 1654, recorded in a note he kept sewn into his coat for the rest of his life, he ended his mathematical correspondence with Fermat and withdrew a short book on the vacuum that was ready for the printer. From 1656 he wrote on theology, in the Provincial Letters and then in notes for a defence of Christianity; he returned to mathematics only briefly, on the cycloid in 1658-59.
This sits alongside the profile's wide range across fields: after 1654 his published work was in a different field from the mathematics and physics of the preceding years, though the sources describe the cause of the change in religious terms and it is not interpreted further here. Cross-Domain Range
Similar People
People whose overall profiles resemble theirs.


Bertrand Russell

Benjamin Franklin

Socrates

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Leonardo da Vinci
Opposite Profile
Not a rival — a different profile shape worth a look.

Harriet Tubman
Sources
- Blaise Pascal (Q1290) -- verified live via wbgetentities (2026-10-04): en label 'Blaise Pascal', description 'French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer, and Christian philosopher (1623-1662)', P569 19 Jun 1623, P570 19 Aug 1662, citizenship Kingdom of France (Q70972), instance of human, ko label '블레즈 파스칼' with a kowiki sitelink, P18 two images (Edelinck engraving, Versailles painting). Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Blaise Pascal, English Wikipedia (opening summary read 2026-10-04) -- orientation only; used to check the outline of his career and the standard list of contributions; not used as support for any scored row.
- J. J. O'Connor and E. F. Robertson, 'Blaise Pascal', MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews (last updated 1996) -- scholarly biographical summary (non-self) drawing on Adamson, Taton and the Dictionary of Scientific Biography; read in full. Used for the dated outline of his mathematics and physics (conics 1639-40, calculator from 1642, vacuum experiments 1646-48, hydrostatics 1653, the 1654 correspondence with Fermat, the 1658 cycloid contest). Its date of 'June 1647' for Descartes's letter to Carcavi disagrees with Tulloch (1649) and is not used.
- Desmond M. Clarke, 'Blaise Pascal', Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (first published 2007, substantive revision 2015) -- scholarly encyclopedia article (non-self), critical in places of Pascal's reasoning about experiment and hypothesis and of the family's hagiographic life. Read Section 1 (Life and Works) and Section 4 (Theory of Knowledge, including the vacuum dispute with Descartes and the puy-de-Dôme experiment) in full and skimmed Sections 2-3; Sections 5-6 not read. Its health and psychological passages (including the citation of Cole) are not used.
- John Tulloch, Pascal (Edinburgh and London: Blackwood, 1878; ed. Mrs Oliphant), Project Gutenberg eBook #26726 -- Victorian Protestant scholar's biography (non-self), sympathetic but openly critical of Pascal's zeal in the 1646 Rouen affair of the Capuchin Jacques Forton and of the later austerities; draws on Gilberte Périer, Jacqueline Pascal's letters, Cousin and Faugère. Read Chapters I and II in full (family, youth, the machine, the vacuum, Descartes, Noël, the cycloid, the carrosses), Chapter III to Jacqueline's entry into Port-Royal, Chapter IV from the 1654 conversion to Pascal's death (including the 1661 Formulary dispute) and the passages of Chapter V on the origin and reception of the Provincial Letters. Its medical and psychological commentary (Lélut, Voltaire on the 1654 'abyss') is not used.
- 'Blaise Pascal: l'homme, l'oeuvre', Bibliothèque du Patrimoine de Clermont Auvergne Métropole, with the Muséum Henri-Lecoq and the mathematics laboratory of Université Clermont Auvergne; texts prepared under the scientific supervision of Pascal specialist Dominique Descotes -- institutional heritage website (non-self; local and celebratory in tone). Read the pages on his life, the calculating machine and its eight surviving originals, the puy-de-Dôme experiment (with the dates of his letter and Périer's report), the arithmetical triangle and the origin of probability, the cycloid contest, the Provincial Letters, the Poitou drainage company and the carrosses à cinq sols.
- Pascal-Fermat correspondence on the problem of points, 1654, with the exchange of 1660: English translation of the texts in Tannery and Henry, Oeuvres de Fermat vol. II (York University history-of-statistics collection, 17 pp.), checked against the French of Pascal's letters of 29 July, 24 August and 27 October 1654 and Fermat's letters of 9 August and 25 September 1654 in the Brunschvicg-Boutroux edition (Hachette, 1923; Wikisource) -- PRIMARY correspondence from both men, including Fermat's letter to Carcavi about Pascal; Fermat is an independent peer perspective. Read those letters in French and the 1660 exchange in English; the long technical sections were skimmed. The York translation's 'I can no longer doubt that I was wrong' (29 July) renders 'je ne doute plus que je ne sois dans la verite' and is not used.
- Gilberte Périer, La Vie de M. Pascal (written 1662-63), as copied in Clermont manuscript MS 2810 (1680), Wikisource transcription -- FAMILY perspective (his elder sister; admiring, hagiographic and partisan in aim). Read the passages on his education, the calculating machine, the vacuum experiments, the Provincial Letters and the cycloid. Her accounts of his asceticism, illness and religious experience are not used.
- Blaise Pascal, dedicatory letter to Chancellor Séguier and 'Avis' to readers on the arithmetical machine (1645), with the royal privilege of 22 May 1649 (Wikisource transcription of the printed booklet) -- SELF account plus a royal chancery grant that recites his own petition. Read in full.
- Leon Brunschvicg, editorial introductions to the Pascal-Noël correspondence and to Pascal's letter to Florin Périer of 15 November 1647, in Oeuvres de Blaise Pascal, ed. Brunschvicg and Boutroux, vol. II (Paris: Hachette, 1923), Wikisource transcription -- SCHOLAR-editor (non-self) weighing Pascal, Noël, Mersenne, Roberval and Descartes against each other on the vacuum controversy and the origin of the puy-de-Dôme experiment. Read both introductions in full.
- Blaise Pascal, letter to Florin Périer of 15 November 1647 (as printed by Pascal in 1648) and reply to Father Étienne Noël (autumn 1647), in the Brunschvicg-Boutroux edition (1923), Wikisource transcription -- SELF. Read the Périer letter in full and the opening, methodological section of the reply to Noël.
- Father Étienne Noël, S.J., second letter to Pascal (late 1647), in the Brunschvicg-Boutroux edition (1923), Wikisource transcription -- ADVERSARY (Jesuit rector who defended the plenum against Pascal). Read the opening section.
- Thomas M'Crie (trans.), The Provincial Letters of Blaise Pascal, with historical introduction and notes (1847), Project Gutenberg eBook #73959 -- nineteenth-century Scottish Presbyterian translator's introduction (non-self; strongly sympathetic to Pascal and hostile to the Jesuits); reports Nicole's testimony on how Pascal drafted the Letters, their circulation and condemnation, the Jesuit replies of Father Daniel and the 1661 Formulary dispute. Read the introduction's account of their composition, reception and the Jesuit replies and the closing lines of Letter 16; the Letters themselves were not read through.
- Joseph Lataste, 'Blaise Pascal', Catholic Encyclopedia vol. 11 (New York, 1913), Wikisource transcription -- CRITICAL Catholic perspective (non-self): accepts Pascal's good faith and the substantial accuracy of his quotations but faults his method and his exclusive attack on the Jesuits. Read the biographical and Provincial Letters sections.