

József Borsos and Albert Doctor (Borsos és Doctor studio), 'Semmelweiss Ignácz', carte-de-visite photograph, 1860; National Széchényi Library, Manuscript Collection; Wikimedia Commons file 'Borsos & Doctor Semmelweis Ignác.jpg' (authors died 1883 and 1888) · Borsos és Doctor studio carte-de-visite, 1860, National Széchényi Library (OSZK) Manuscript Collection, via Wikimedia Commons (hand crop of the 1000 x 1580 scan, no upscaling) · Public domain
Trait Constellation
Key Achievements
In 1847, as assistant in the First Obstetric Clinic of the Vienna General Hospital, Semmelweis tied the clinic's heavy toll from childbed fever to doctors and students who came to the labour ward from the dissecting room. From late May 1847 he required everyone to wash their hands in a chlorinated-lime solution before examining women; monthly mortality, over 18 per cent in April, fell to 2.38 per cent in June and 1.20 per cent in July.
Semmelweis compared the First Clinic, where medical students were trained, with the Second, where midwives were trained: over 1841-46 the First recorded 9.92 per cent mortality against 3.38 per cent in the Second. He used that contrast, and the fall after 1847, to argue against the prevailing 'epidemic influences' explanation, and in 1861 he published his case as Die Aetiologie, der Begriff und die Prophylaxis des Kindbettfiebers, a 543-page book with statistical tables and replies to critics that named decomposing matter from cadavers and from living patients as the cause.
Moments That Reveal Them
In 1861 Semmelweis answered his critics with open letters to the obstetricians Spaeth, Scanzoni and Siebold. He wrote that thousands of mothers and infants had died since 1847 who need not have died had he not stayed silent, told Siebold, a friend since 1847, that not sharing his view was equivalent to being a murderer, and offered to teach assembled German physicians until all were convinced. Siebold's posthumous letters of 1862 say he forgave his friend Semmelweis, and Kugelmann, an admirer, had asked in July 1861 for gentler treatment of Siebold.
This is consistent with the high conflict tolerance in this profile: after years of silence he chose open confrontation with senior opponents, and the replies from Siebold and Kugelmann suggest the tone cost him goodwill even among people who respected his results. Conflict Tolerance
In October 1847 a woman with a discharging cancer of the cervix was examined first on the ward round; Semmelweis and the students washed with soap and water as before and examined the other women, and eleven of the twelve women examined after her developed childbed fever. He concluded that matter from living patients, not only from cadavers, could cause the fever and required chlorinated-lime washing after any contaminated examination; a similar cluster in November led him to add air in the ward as a possible carrier.
This episode helps explain why this profile's belief updating sits only near the middle: he revised the mechanism when the results contradicted it, but his writings of 1861 presented the doctrine as settled. Belief Updating
Turning Points
In March 1849 Professor Klein blocked the extension of Semmelweis's assistantship in the First Clinic, and the Ministry rejected his appeal in November 1850. Appointed a lecturer on 10 October 1850, Semmelweis left Vienna for Pest within days; there he became honorary head of the St Rochus maternity division in May 1851 and professor of obstetrics in July 1855. Until 1857 his discovery was presented in print by others, notably Hebra and Skoda.
This episode sits alongside the profile's persistence score: he kept seeking posts from which to apply the method, yet the move coincided with years in which others, not he, explained his work in print. Persistence
Similar People
People whose overall profiles resemble theirs.


Rachel Carson

B. R. Ambedkar

George Orwell

Elizabeth Cady Stanton

Rosalind Franklin
Opposite Profile
Not a rival — a different profile shape worth a look.

Duke Ellington
Sources
- Ignaz Semmelweis (English Wikipedia) -- orientation only; not used as support for any scored row. Korean Wikipedia title '이그나츠 제멜바이스' confirmed via the Wikidata kowiki sitelink.
- Ignaz Semmelweis (Q59736) -- verified live via wbgetentities (2026-10-04): en label 'Ignaz Semmelweis', description 'Hungarian physician, early pioneer of antiseptic procedures (1818–1865)', instance of human, P569 1818-07-01, P570 1865-08-13, citizenship Austrian Empire (Q131964) and Hungary (Q28), ko label '이그나츠 제멜바이스', enwiki 'Ignaz Semmelweis', kowiki '이그나츠 제멜바이스', P18 'Borsos & Doctor Semmelweis Ignác cropped.jpg'. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Fritz Schürer von Waldheim, Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis: Sein Leben und Wirken. Urteile der Mit- und Nachwelt (Vienna and Leipzig: A. Hartleben, 1905), Internet Archive full text (b24875788, German OCR) -- NON-SELF, ADMIRING BIOGRAPHY by a Viennese physician who worked from Ministry of Education and medical-faculty files, the letters of Semmelweis's widow, the notes of his Pest colleagues Hirschler and Hegar and Kußmaul's memoir, and who reprints contemporary documents in full or in extract (Hebra's reports of December 1847 and April 1848, Haller's 1848 hospital report and 1849 society minute, Brücke's 31 Oct 1850 report to the Academy of Sciences, Skoda's Oct 1849 lecture, the letters of Tilanus and Michaelis, Levy's 1848 critique, Liebig's 1859 letter, Siebold's 1861 article and 1862 posthumous remark, Kugelmann's 1861 letters) as well as long extracts from Semmelweis's own 1861 book and open letters (SELF, as quoted). Read locally: childhood to departure from Vienna (pp. 1-92), the Pest years 1850-57 (pp. 93-125), the 1858-59 reception, and the chapter on the 1861 book, the open letters to Spaeth, Scanzoni and Siebold and the replies of Kugelmann (pp. 154-180). The last chapters on his illness, hospitalisation and death and the author's psychological and medical speculation about his later years were NOT used as evidence. Partisan against Klein, Scanzoni and Braun; that tone is discounted.
- Nicholas Kadar and Russell D. Croft, 'Why Semmelweis's doctrine was rejected: evidence from the first publication of his results by Friedrich Wieger, and an editorial commenting on the results', British Journal for the History of Science 53(3), September 2020, pp. 389-395 (Cambridge Core PDF, doi 10.1017/S0007087420000229), read in full -- NON-SELF, MODERN SCHOLARLY (two retired physicians and independent historians; argumentative and critical of other historians' accounts, notably Loudon and Tulodziecki). Read: Wieger's 20 April 1849 eyewitness account of the Vienna practice (nail-brush scrubbing; a midwife's sponge as a non-cadaver source; wards exchanged without effect); the 1850 Gazette médicale de Paris editorial rejecting the Vienna figures as post hoc reasoning; Klein's objection of the same kind (per Lesky 1964); the October and November 1847 setbacks and what Semmelweis changed after them; the 1850 lecture on self-infection; the animal experiments with Lautner. Their own thesis (that animal experiments were aimed at the post hoc objection) is treated as their interpretation, not as fact.
- Sir William J. Sinclair (Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Manchester), Semmelweis: His Life and His Doctrine (Manchester University Press, 1909), Internet Archive full text (semmelweishislif00sinc) -- NON-SELF SECONDARY BIOGRAPHY by a British obstetrician, sympathetic but not uncritical. Read locally: the 'Elimination of Factors' and 'Removal from Assistantship' chapters (his retelling of the 1861 book's tables and the epidemic, fear, priest's-bell and birth-position hypotheses he examined; the October 1846 re-appointment of Breit; the winter 1846-47 English study; the Venice trip), the Kußmaul and Skoda passages, and the later chapters on the open letters, quoting Bruck's judgement that the letters embittered the controversy. Much of the early narrative is paraphrased from Semmelweis's own 1861 text, so for those passages it is a SELF perspective at one remove; the Pest-period assessments are Sinclair's own. His and others' passages on Semmelweis's final illness were NOT used.
- Adolf Kußmaul, Jugenderinnerungen eines alten Arztes (Stuttgart: Bonz, 1899), Internet Archive full text (jugenderinnerun00kussgoog, poor Fraktur OCR), the Vienna chapter on Semmelweis and Klein (printed pp. 372-375) -- NON-SELF, FIRSTHAND CONTEMPORARY (the Baden physician who took Semmelweis's obstetric course in the autumn of 1847 and practised in the First Clinic with his friend Bronner, recalling it five decades later, partly from a letter to his father). Read: his account of two patients with infected tissue on the ward and the small outbreaks among women delivered beside them, his promise to tell the Heidelberg professor Naegele of the discovery, his portrait of Klein and the anecdote of Klein, a midwife and a disputed examination in which Semmelweis stood behind Klein and was visibly angry. His physical and character description of Semmelweis is read as quoted in the two biographies above because the OCR of that line is garbled. His remark on Semmelweis's later mental illness was NOT used.
- Semmelweis University, 'Short History' (semmelweis.hu, English), read in full -- INSTITUTIONAL (the university that bears his name; commemorative). Used only for: Semmelweis as professor and director of obstetrics and gynaecology at the Pest university 1855-1865, the title 'saviour of mothers', that his work met strong opposition in his lifetime, and that the Budapest University of Medicine took his name on 7 November 1969.
- Wellcome Collection catalogue record for Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, Die Aetiologie, der Begriff und die Prophylaxis des Kindbettfiebers (Pest, Vienna and Leipzig: C. A. Hartleben, 1861; vi, 543 pages), read in full -- INSTITUTIONAL CATALOGUE RECORD. Used only to confirm the title, publisher, date and extent of the 1861 book; it describes no behaviour.