

Martin Droeshout, 1623, First Folio frontispiece; digital facsimile courtesy of the Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford (Arch. G c.7), CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons, 'Shakespeare Droeshout 1623.jpg' -- Martin Droeshout, copper engraving, frontispiece of the First Folio (1623), cropped scan from the Bodleian Libraries' digital facsimile of Arch. G c.7; original Commons file 2640 x 2640 pixels, downscaled once to 1200 x 1200 (never upscaled). A posthumous published engraving prepared for the Folio, not a likeness drawn from a documented sitting. · Public Domain (engraving of 1623; artist died c. 1650); facsimile source published by the Bodleian under CC BY 3.0
작가 · 근세
윌리엄 셰익스피어
1564–1616
주요 업적 분야
아직 성격 매칭에 포함되지 않았습니다 — 기록된 근거가 성격 모델 전체를 다루기에는 충분하지 않습니다. 이 페이지의 다른 모든 내용은 자유롭게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
핵심 특성
주요 업적
1598년 프랜시스 미어스는 그를 희극과 비극 모두에서 영국 최고의 극작가로 꼽으며, <로미오와 줄리엣>과 <한여름 밤의 꿈>을 포함한 열두 편을 열거했다.
그의 동료 배우 두 사람이 엮은 1623년 퍼스트 폴리오는 희곡 36편을 모았고 그중 18편은 그전에 인쇄된 적이 없어, <맥베스>, <십이야>, <템페스트> 같은 작품이 보존되었다.
그는 거의 20년 동안 궁내부장관 극단(훗날 국왕 극단)의 전속 극작가이자 지분을 가진 단원이었고, 글로브와 블랙프라이어스 극장을 소유한 조합의 일원이었다.
삶의 장면들
1595년 3월 15일 궁정 재무관의 장부에는 1594년 성탄절에 여왕 앞에서 공연한 두 편의 대가가 윌리엄 켐프, 윌리엄 셰익스피어, 리처드 버비지에게 지급된 것으로 기록되어, 그가 극단의 핵심 인물들과 나란히 이름을 올렸다.
극단이 그를 글쓰기만이 아니라 운영에도 믿고 맡긴 구성원이었다는 점과 일치한다. 협업 성향
벤 존슨은 배우들이 셰익스피어가 한 줄도 지운 적이 없다고 칭찬하곤 했으나 자신은 "천 줄은 지웠으면" 하고 답했다고 적었고, 그래도 그 사람을 사랑했으며 그의 글솜씨가 너무 술술 흘러 때로는 멈추게 해야 했다고 평했다.
빠르고 유려하게 쓰는 작가였다는 점과 일치하며, 가장 가까운 경쟁자가 이를 칭찬하면서도 비판했다는 점이 함께 드러난다. 실행 속도
전환점
1594년 무렵 역병으로 극장이 닫혔다가 풀린 뒤 그는 새로 만들어진 궁내부장관 극단에 합류해 지분을 가진 단원이 되었고, 훗날 국왕 극단이 된 이 극단에서 평생 활동했다.
여러 극단을 위해 쓰던 데서 한 극단을 위해 쓰고 함께 소유하는 쪽으로 옮겨 간 변화와 일치한다. 기회 감지
비슷한 인물
전체적인 프로필이 이 사람과 닮은 사람들이에요.


듀크 엘링턴

닐스 보어

표도르 도스토옙스키

모리타 아키오

볼프강 아마데우스 모차르트
출처
- William Shakespeare (Q692) -- verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-11): English label 'William Shakespeare', description 'English playwright and poet (1564-1616)', Korean label present, baptism/birth given as 1564 (several dates recorded), died 23 April 1616 (a second death date is also recorded). Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, 'Shakespeare's Career' (Shakespedia) -- CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE: the Trust's account of his reputation established in London by 1592, the two narrative poems, membership and sharership in the Lord Chamberlain's Men (later the King's Men), almost twenty years as the company's regular dramatist at roughly two plays a year, membership of the Globe and Blackfriars syndicates, and the First Folio as the best illustration of his pre-eminence. Read in full.
- Folger Shakespeare Library (with the British Library, Bodleian Libraries, Shakespeare Birthplace Trust and The National Archives), 'Playwright, actor & shareholder', Shakespeare Documented -- overview essay and document list on Shakespeare's work as actor, playwright and shareholder in the Lord Chamberlain's / King's Men, and the company's playhouses (the Theatre, the Globe from 1599, Blackfriars from 1609). Read in full, plus the sub-essays 'Shakespeare's company', 'Shakespeare's playhouses' and 'Contemporary accounts and critical responses to plays'.
- Alan H. Nelson and Folger staff, 'Exchequer, Pipe Office, Declared Accounts: Listing Shakespeare as a leading player of the Lord Chamberlain's company' (The National Archives E 351/542, payment of 15 March 1595), Shakespeare Documented -- essay on the Treasurer of the Household's account naming William Kempe, William Shakespeare and Richard Burbage as the payees for two plays shown before the Queen at Christmas 1594. Read in full.
- Folger Shakespeare Library, 'Inquisition Post Mortem of Thomas Brend, showing Shakespeare and others occupying the Globe playhouse' (17 May 1599, The National Archives), Shakespeare Documented -- essay on the near-contemporary record of the newly built Globe 'in the occupation of William Shakespeare and others', read as evidence of his participation in the lease and a leading position among its leaseholders. Read in full.
- Folger Shakespeare Library, 'Shakespeare's playhouses', Shakespeare Documented -- overview essay on the Theatre, the Globe (1599) and the Blackfriars indoor playhouse, stating that Shakespeare was one of the original seven shareholders of the reorganized Blackfriars in 1608 and listing the Globe lease deeds of 1601 and 1608 that name him. The tail of the Blackfriars paragraph was cut off in the page text and was not read. Read to that point.
- Heather Wolfe, 'Greenes, groats-worth of witte: First printed allusion to Shakespeare as a playwright' (1592; Folger STC 12245), Shakespeare Documented -- essay on the pamphlet that attacks an 'upstart Crow' and 'Shake-scene', on Henry Chettle's apology in Kind-Heart's Dream and Thomas Nashe's denial of authorship. HOSTILE CONTEMPORARY witness (and Chettle's defence of him, as summarized by the Folger). Read in full; the Chettle document's own Folger page carries no description and Chettle's text itself was not read.
- Folger Shakespeare Library, 'George a Greene: George Buc interviews William Shakespeare and Edward Juby' (1599), Shakespeare Documented -- essay on the marginal notes in which the future Master of the Revels records two actors' answers about who wrote an anonymous play, with Shakespeare described as a leading member of the Lord Chamberlain's Men. Read in full.
- Grace Ioppolo, 'Henslowe's diary: including the first recorded performances of Henry VI and Titus Andronicus', Shakespeare Documented (Dulwich College MSS 7) -- essay on Philip Henslowe's account book: the diary does not name Shakespeare, but records performances of plays of his by other companies in 1592-94, and Ioppolo states there is no evidence he belonged to Lord Strange's Men and that he became a sharer in the Lord Chamberlain's Men in 1594. Read in full.
- Ben Jonson, 'Timber, or Discoveries' (written c. 1630, printed 1641), the passage 'De Shakspeare nostrat', Project Gutenberg ebook 5134 (Discoveries Made Upon Men and Matter and Some Poems, Cassell edition with Morley's introduction) -- PEER witness, a rival dramatist and friend writing some years after Shakespeare's death: he reports that the players praised Shakespeare for never blotting a line, says he answered 'Would he had blotted a thousand', and calls him honest, of an open and free nature, with an excellent fancy, brave notions and gentle expressions, but one whose facility sometimes needed to be stopped. Written from memory and as a personal note-book, so used for the characterization, not for dated events. Read the passage in full.
- Ben Jonson, 'To the memory of my beloved, the Author, Mr. William Shakespeare' (First Folio, 1623), transcription from The Works of Ben Jonson, vol. 3 (Chatto & Windus, 1910), Luminarium -- the commemorative poem. ADMIRING and a commissioned tribute, so only used for its remark that art as well as nature made him, that a poet must 'sweat' and 'strike the second heat upon the Muses' anvil', and for the 'small Latin and less Greek' line. Read in full as quoted.
- Internet Shakespeare Editions (University of Victoria), 'The First Folio (1623)' -- Life and Times essay quoting the 'To the great Variety of Readers' preface signed by John Heminge and Henry Condell, Shakespeare's fellow actors and editors of the Folio: 'His mind and hand went together; and what he thought, he uttered with that easiness, that we have scarce received from him a blot in his papers.' COLLEAGUE witness, admiring and published after his death. Read in full.
- 'Prose Contributions to Shakespeare's First Folio', The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson (Electronic edition, University of Victoria / HCMC) -- scholarly introduction on who wrote the Folio's prefaces, concluding that the 'blot' sentence was drafted by Heminges and Condell rather than Jonson and setting it beside Jonson's Discoveries passage. Read the relevant sections.
- Internet Shakespeare Editions, 'The first rave review' -- Francis Meres, Palladis Tamia: Wit's Treasury (1598), as quoted by permission of the Folger: Meres compares Shakespeare with Ovid in poetry and with Plautus and Seneca in comedy and tragedy and lists twelve plays by title. CONTEMPORARY CRITIC; the site notes he was unusually uncritical in his praise of English writers in general. Read in full.
- Michael Best, 'Textual Introduction' to King Lear, Internet Shakespeare Editions (University of Victoria; the page is marked as not peer reviewed) -- modern scholarly account of the 1608 quarto and 1623 Folio versions, setting out the case that Shakespeare himself revised the play, the contrary arguments and the evidence of authorial draft copy, and stating that scholars are divided. MODERN SCHOLARSHIP, explicitly contested. Read the revision sections in full.
- Peter Kirwan, 'Collaborations and (mis)attributions', Shakespeare Documented (Folger Shakespeare Library) -- scholarly essay on the Shakespeare Apocrypha, stating that scholars are now more willing to accept Shakespeare writing plays collaboratively and that The Two Noble Kinsmen has reached general consensus as collaborative. Read in full.
- Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, 'The Bodleian First Folio' (digital facsimile of Arch. G c.7) -- institution page used only to check the rights notice for the portrait source images (published under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported licence). Not used for any scoring.
