

Etienne Carjat, Victor Hugo, 1876, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (original from the Bibliotheque nationale de France) · Portrait photograph of Victor Hugo by Etienne Carjat, published in 1876 in the serial Galerie contemporaine, litteraire, artistique (Goupil & Cie) as a woodburytype; Commons file 'Victor Hugo by Etienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg', cited to the Gallica copy of the Bibliotheque nationale de France. Downscaled from 2140 x 2632 pixels to 976 x 1200 with no cropping and no upscaling. · Public domain (photographer died 1906; published 1876)
작가 · 19세기
빅토르 위고
1802–1885
주요 업적 분야
아직 성격 매칭에 포함되지 않았습니다 — 기록된 근거가 성격 모델 전체를 다루기에는 충분하지 않습니다. 이 페이지의 다른 모든 내용은 자유롭게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
핵심 특성
주요 업적
시인이자 극작가, 소설가로, 브리태니커가 프랑스 낭만주의 작가 중 가장 중요한 인물로 꼽는다. 『크롬웰』 서문(1827)에서 낭만주의 희곡론을 밝혔고, 1830년 2월 25일 「에르나니」 초연은 낭만파가 고전파를 이긴 사건이 되었다.
소설 『노트르담 드 파리』(1831)와 『레 미제라블』(1862)을 썼다. 『레 미제라블』은 열 차례로 나뉘어 연재되어 곧바로 유럽과 북미에서 베스트셀러가 되었다.
프랑스에서 가장 위대한 시인의 한 사람으로 평가받으며, 『동방 시집』부터 『명상 시집』(1856)에 이르는 시집을 냈다. 1841년 아카데미 프랑세즈 회원으로 선출되었다.
삶의 장면들
1827년 그는 운문극 『크롬웰』을 발표하며, 비극과 희극의 요소를 한데 섞고 고전 비극의 규칙을 버린 희곡을 요구하는 긴 서문을 붙였다. 브리태니커는 이 서문이 희곡 자체보다 훨씬 중요해졌다고 적는다.
이는 새로운 형식을 이론과 작품으로 함께 제시한 작가의 모습과 일치한다. 창의적 독창성
『명상 시집』이 성공을 거두자 그는 1856년 건지섬의 오트빌 하우스를 사들였고, 섬 곳곳에서 중고 가구와 물건을 모으며 여러 달 동안 대대적인 개조와 장식을 직접 지휘했다.
이는 집 한 채를 짓고 꾸미는 데까지 이어진 강한 개인적 취향과 일치한다. 미적 감각
전환점
1856년부터 1870년까지 건지섬에 머물며 『명상 시집』, 『레 미제라블』, 『바다의 노동자들』 등 가장 잘 알려진 작품 대부분을 그곳에서 쓰거나 완성하거나 펴냈다.
이는 한곳에 자리 잡고 이어 간 길고 꾸준한 작업 습관과 일치한다. 자기 규율
비슷한 인물
전체적인 프로필이 이 사람과 닮은 사람들이에요.


쿠사마 야요이

프리다 칼로

라빈드라나트 타고르

마야 안젤루

치누아 아체베
출처
- Victor Hugo (Q535), verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-31): English description 'French novelist, poet, dramatist and politician (1802-1885)', born 1802-02-26, died 1885-05-22, Korean label present, image 'Victor Hugo by Etienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg'. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Jean-Bertrand Barrere (Professor of French Literature, Cambridge), 'Victor Hugo', Encyclopaedia Britannica, read from the start through the 1851 coup (the exile and last-years sections are behind the subscription wall and were not read). CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE: 'the most important of the French Romantic writers', regarded in France as one of its greatest poets and better known abroad for Notre-Dame de Paris (1831) and Les Miserables (1862); founded a review at about seventeen, the Conservateur Litteraire (1819-21); the long preface to Cromwell (1827) as a Romantic manifesto that 'has proved far more important than the play itself'; the first performance of Hernani on 25 February 1830 as the victory of the Romantics over the Classicists; a sidebar stating that he wrote 100 lines of verse or 20 pages of prose each morning; a wish to be the 'sonorous echo' of his time; election to the French Academy in 1841 'after three unsuccessful attempts'. Reference entry by a specialist; the praise is retrospective.
- Academie francaise, page on Victor Hugo (seat 14), read through a summarising fetch and not as raw text: elected 7 January 1841 by 17 votes out of 32 and received on 3 June 1841; first stood in 1836; his major works; the Hernani premiere described as a battle between literary camps and a triumph for the Romantics; he refused to become directeur while Alfred de Vigny was effectively ostracised by the Academy, and after Nisard's election in 1850 called for academicians to be chosen by writers' societies; he bequeathed his manuscripts and drawings to the national library. Institutional page; its account of the Academy is partly self-interested.
- Algernon Charles Swinburne, 'Hugo, Victor Marie', Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition (1911), read on Wikisource through the mid-1840s: a long, openly admiring appreciation by a fellow poet that lists his odes, ballads, Cromwell, Les Orientales, the plays Hernani, Le Roi s'amuse, Ruy Blas and Les Burgraves, the novels, the essays and the travel letters Le Rhin, and records that he refused to allow Marion de Lorme, banned under Charles X, to be staged under the next government. Period source; strongly admiring, so used only for the list of forms and works, not for any judgement of quality.
- Guernsey Museums, 'A Brief Summary of Victor Hugo's Life', read in full: he realised a literary calling by thirteen, led the Romantic movement in the 1820s, the 'battle' of Hernani as a turning point in French literary history, mixed success in the theatre in the 1830s, election to the Academy 'at the fifth attempt', and during the Guernsey years (1855-70) he wrote, completed or published most of his best-known works, including Les Contemplations (1856), Les Miserables (1862), Les Travailleurs de la mer (1866) and Quatre-vingt-treize (1874). Local museum biography; sympathetic to its famous resident, and its attempt count differs from Britannica's.
- Guernsey Museums, 'Hauteville House', read in full: he bought the house on 16 May 1856 with the proceeds of Les Contemplations, was an enthusiastic collector of second-hand furniture and bric-a-brac, spent months overseeing a major conversion on a medieval pattern, and filled it with decoration; his son Charles called it 'a veritable three-storey autograph, a poem in several rooms'; the house was given to the City of Paris in 1927. Museum page for the house, with a family quotation; partly promotional.
- Charles Walton (Yale historian), 'The Missing Half of Les Mis', History News Network (adapted from Foreign Affairs), read as the excerpt available: Les Miserables (1862) was serialised in ten instalments by a market-savvy publisher and became an immediate bestseller across Europe and North America, police were called to hold back crowds on days of new instalments, Flaubert postponed his own book, an Atlantic reviewer called the publicity 'the grossest bookselling humbug', and the novel's reception in France was mixed. Historian's opinion piece; only the excerpt was read.
- Paste Magazine review of David Bellos, 'The Novel of the Century' (on Les Miserables), read in full: Hugo wrote the novel from scribbled notes into a vast work, it was published in 1862 and stayed profitable, and contemporaries such as Baudelaire (privately), Flaubert, Dumas and Merimee reacted with open scorn. The critical quotations reach this profile only through the reviewer's summary of the book, not from the letters themselves. Independent and adversarial voice, but second-hand.
