에이다 러브레이스
82% 프로필 일치도
Photo: Kushal Das, 2024, CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons 'Guido van Rossum in PyConUS24 (cropped).jpg' (derivative of 'Guido van Rossum in PyConUS24.jpg'): photograph by Kushal Das taken 15 May 2024 at PyCon US, uploaded by the photographer as own work under CC BY-SA 4.0. Original 3992 x 5976; the cropped derivative is 1721 x 2293 and was downscaled to 901 x 1200 (never upscaled). · CC BY-SA 4.0
컴퓨터 과학자 · 현대
귀도 반 로섬
b. 1956
주요 업적 분야
기술혁신
아직 성격 매칭에 포함되지 않았습니다 — 기록된 근거가 성격 모델 전체를 다루기에는 충분하지 않습니다. 이 페이지의 다른 모든 내용은 자유롭게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
핵심 특성
주요 업적
1991년 처음 공개된 프로그래밍 언어 파이썬을 만들었다. 쉽고 직관적이며 오픈소스이고 평이한 영어처럼 읽히는 것을 목표로 했고, 컴퓨터역사박물관은 머신러닝에서 교육까지 폭넓게 쓰인다고 설명한다.
커뮤니티가 붙여 준 '자비로운 종신 독재자(BDFL)'라는 직함으로 파이썬의 개발과 커뮤니티를 이끌며 언어를 둘러싼 분쟁을 조정했다. 컴퓨터역사박물관은 파이썬의 창조와 발전, 커뮤니티 리더십을 이유로 그를 2018년 펠로로 선정했다.
PEP 3000에서 파이썬 2와의 하위 호환성을 깨는 파이썬 3의 추진 방침을 밝혔다. 파이썬 소프트웨어 재단은 많은 사용자가 업그레이드하지 않았고 파이썬 2 지원이 2020년 1월 1일에야 끝났다고 설명한다.
삶의 장면들
2018년 파이썬 언어 서밋에서 그는 PEP 572 논쟁이 여러 메일링 리스트 글타래로 번지는 동안, 자신은 대체로 갈등을 피하는 편이며 BDFL 권한으로 토론을 끊고 싶지 않다고 말했다.
이는 단호한 권한 행사보다 논의가 이어지도록 두는 쪽을 택한 지도자의 모습과 일치하며, 동료들도 이 점을 문제 삼았다. 갈등 감내
2018년 7월 그는 핵심 개발자들에게 BDFL에서 물러나며 후계자를 지명하지 않겠다고 알리고, PEP 결정 방식과 핵심 개발자 영입 방식을 그들이 정하도록 맡겼다. 커뮤니티는 이후 5인 운영위원회 모델을 채택했다.
이는 후계자를 지목하는 대신 프로젝트 의사결정을 더 넓은 팀에 넘기려는 태도와 일치한다. 협업 성향
전환점
PEP 3000에서 그는 하위 호환성을 깨는 파이썬 3.0을 추진하기로 하면서, 한동안 파이썬 2.x 릴리스도 병행될 것으로 내다보았다.
이는 언어의 장기 방향을 위해 비용이 크고 논란이 있는 호환성 단절을 감수한 태도와 일치한다. 위험 감수
비슷한 인물
전체적인 프로필이 이 사람과 닮은 사람들이에요.
출처
- Guido van Rossum (Q30942) -- verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-24): English label 'Guido van Rossum', description 'Dutch programmer and creator of Python', born 31 January 1956, no date of death, Korean label present, four P18 image values. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Computer History Museum, 'Guido van Rossum' 2018 Fellow profile (computerhistory.org), read in full: Fellow citation 'for the creation and evolution of the Python programming language and for leadership of its community'; Python first released in 1991 and in use at companies, NASA and universities; his 1999 report listing goals (easy and intuitive, as powerful as major competitors, open source, readable like plain English, suited to everyday tasks with short development times); the community's title of Benevolent Dictator For Life, in which he helps mediate disputes over the language's development; career from the 1982 University of Amsterdam master's degree through the Netherlands, then NIST and CNRI, Google, and Dropbox from January 2013; ACM Distinguished Engineer 2006. CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE. Institutional and admiring; partly built from his own statements.
- LWN.net, 'Guido van Rossum resigns as Python leader' (lwn.net, 12 July 2018), read in full: reproduces his 'Transfer of power' message to the python-committers list, written after the PEP 572 discussion: he says he no longer wants to fight so hard for a proposal and find that so many people despise his decisions, will remain an ordinary core developer and mentor, will not appoint a successor, and leaves the core developers to decide how PEPs are decided and how core developers are inducted. The message's remarks about fatigue and medical issues were NOT used. Trade-press report quoting the primary message, plus reader comments (not used).
- Jake Edge, 'PEP 572 and decision-making in Python' (LWN.net, 20 June 2018), read in full: report of a 2018 Python Language Summit session he led on the contentious assignment-expression proposal: he summarised the controversy, said he had tried C-style assignment to see how far it would go, said the proposal's bundled comprehension fix should become its own PEP and a new poll was needed, said Python is not a democracy and that colleagues generally agree with his decisions except when he rejects their favourite change; colleagues Lukasz Langa ('dictators should dictate'), Nick Coghlan, Victor Stinner, Brett Cannon, Barry Warsaw and others offered process suggestions; he said he is generally conflict-averse and prefers not to use his BDFL powers to shut down a discussion, and that he stopped reading the threads. Independent trade-press account with named colleagues; a few of the statements are his own reported words.
- Jake Edge, 'Python gets a new governance model' (LWN.net, 18 December 2018), read in full: after his resignation the core developers debated voting systems and chose, by a Condorcet vote of 62 of 94 eligible voters, the Steering Council model (PEP 8016) in which five people elected by the core team replace a single dictator. Independent trade-press account of the post-BDFL process; it describes the community's response and says little about him personally.
- Bill Venners, 'The Making of Python: A Conversation with Guido van Rossum, Part I' (Artima Developer, 13 January 2003), read in full: he describes working as an implementer on the ABC language team at CWI in the early 1980s, says he is indebted to ABC and its designers, and took ABC's ingredients and shuffled them; he describes adding namespaces as modules after experience with Modula-2 and Modula-3, allowing modules written in C so that colleagues and users wrote extension modules. Interviewer-led but largely his own account, so treated as self-account.
- Guido van Rossum, 'PEP 3000 -- Python 3000' (peps.python.org), read: the process document for the backward-incompatible Python 3.0, in which he states that Python 3.0 will break backwards compatibility with Python 2.x, expects parallel 2.x and 3.x releases for some time, and sets numbering and naming conventions. Primary project document written by him; used only to establish that he led the decision, not for any trait claim about motives.
- Python Software Foundation (python.org), 'Sunsetting Python 2', read in full: the project says Python 3.0 was started in 2006 because big changes were needed, that many people did not upgrade, that in 2008 it announced a 2015 sunset for Python 2, and that in 2014 it extended the sunset to 1 January 2020, which has since passed. Institutional project statement written as 'we'; shows the long transition timescale, not an individual's behaviour.
- Zed A. Shaw, 'The Case Against Python 3' (Learn Python the Hard Way, 22 November 2016), read: an author-educator's critical essay arguing beginners should avoid Python 3, claiming (in his words) that the language's adoption was only about 30 percent and that the Python project had taken an 'arrogant stance'. COUNTER-VOICE on the Python 3 transition; it criticises the Python project collectively and does not name van Rossum as an individual, and its adoption figures were not verified, so it is used only to record that the transition was contested.
- Wikimedia Commons file pages 'Guido van Rossum in PyConUS24.jpg' and its cropped derivative (wikitext and API record), checked for the portrait's licence: photograph by Kushal Das, taken 15 May 2024 at PyCon US, uploaded by the photographer as own work under CC BY-SA 4.0; original 3992 x 5976, cropped derivative 1721 x 2293. Not used for any scoring.