

Henry Raeburn, James Watt, 1815, oil on canvas, Huntington Art Museum, San Marino, California; photograph by Daderot, CC0 (the painting is public domain: artist died 1823); cropped to the canvas and downscaled · The Huntington Library, Art Museum, and Botanical Gardens, San Marino (Henry Raeburn, oil on canvas, 1815), photographed by Daderot, via Wikimedia Commons · CC0 (photograph); painting public domain
Trait Constellation
Key Achievements
According to Joseph Black's later account, Watt saw in early 1765 that a Newcomen engine wasted steam by cooling its cylinder at every stroke, and that condensing the steam in a separate vessel would avoid this. Engines built to his improved design were made by the firm Boulton and Watt from the mid-1770s, first for draining mines and later for driving machinery.
After James Pickard's 1780 patent covered the crank, Watt's 1781 patent set out five alternative ways of turning an engine's back-and-forth motion into rotation, and the sun-and-planet gear was the one his firm went on to use. His 1784 patent specified the parallel motion, a linkage that guides the piston rod of a beam engine along a near-straight path.
Moments That Reveal Them
In the winter of 1763-64 Watt was asked to repair the University of Glasgow's working model of a Newcomen engine and found that its boiler could not supply enough steam to keep it running. According to John Robison, who watched and later gave an account for Watt's side in a patent suit, Watt tried larger heating surfaces, a wooden boiler and cased cylinders, and showed that more than three-quarters of the steam was being condensed and wasted.
Trying one change after another and measuring the loss, rather than only patching the model, is consistent with the profile's high experimentation score; note that Robison's account was written about thirty years later and for one side of a lawsuit. Experimentation
While setting up the first Boulton and Watt pumping engines in Cornwall in 1777-79, Watt wrote repeatedly asking Boulton to come and settle payment terms with the mine adventurers. After a contentious 1779 meeting at Wheal Union he left before it ended and wrote that he could not bear such treatment, though he also wrote that he would draw no plans for a new engine until its terms were fixed. Smiles quotes these letters, and Bramwell separately describes Watt as averse to bargaining.
The letters sit alongside a preference for leaving face-to-face negotiation to a partner while staying firm about terms in writing, which fits the profile's below-average score for conflict tolerance. Conflict Tolerance
Turning Points
John Roebuck, who held two-thirds of Watt's 1769 patent, became insolvent in the early 1770s, and Matthew Boulton took over Roebuck's share in place of a debt of about 1,200 pounds. Watt, who had been working as a surveyor and canal engineer in Scotland, moved to Birmingham in May 1774; in 1775 Parliament extended the patent's term and the Boulton and Watt partnership began.
Leaving Scotland and a surveying career for a new partnership when the first arrangement collapsed is consistent with the profile's adaptability, although Small's and Boulton's repeated invitations were also part of the move. Adaptability
Similar People
People whose overall profiles resemble theirs.


Charles Darwin

Marie Curie

Rosalind Franklin

Ada Lovelace

Alan Turing
Sources
- James Watt (English Wikipedia; lead section fetched via the MediaWiki API) -- orientation only (identity, dates, occupations); not used as support for any scored row. The Korean Wikipedia page 'ko:제임스 와트' was checked to exist (title only).
- James Watt (Q9041) -- identity verified live through the Wikidata API (wbgetentities: labels, descriptions, claims): en label 'James Watt', description 'British engineer (1736-1819)', ko label '제임스 와트', born 1736-01-19, died 1819 (two day-level values, 19 and 25 Aug; only the year is used), citizenship Scotland (Q22, mapped to GB), P18 'James Watt by Henry Howard.jpg'. Orientation only.
- Samuel Smiles, Lives of Boulton and Watt (London, 1865), Project Gutenberg #52069, full text downloaded and searched locally -- independent Victorian biographer working 'principally from the original Soho MSS' (family-supplied archive; admiring, self-help tone; one perspective). Read closely: ch. V-VIII (Glasgow years, the Newcomen model, Kinneil, surveying), X-XVII (Boulton partnership, Cornwall, the crank/Pickard episode, rotary motion, Hornblowers, mills, workmen), the water-composition and Lunar Society passages of ch. XVIII, the lawsuit and Murdock passages of ch. XX-XXI and ch. XXIII (last years, Scott/Jeffrey testimony). Quotes many letters by Watt, Boulton, Small, Roebuck and Robison that were not opened directly.
- John Robison's narrative of his acquaintance with Watt (Glasgow, 1758-67) as reproduced in J. P. Muirhead, The Life of James Watt (American ed., 1859), ch. VI, archive.org OCR full text (noisy; legible passages only) -- FIRSTHAND account by a close friend and fellow student, written c.1796 as testimony for Watt's side in the patent suit Boulton and Watt v. Hornblower and Maberley, recollecting events some thirty years earlier (interested, from memory). Muirhead was a kinsman of Watt and the editor of his papers (compiler only, weakly independent).
- Joseph Black's short narrative of Watt's improvement of the steam engine, as reproduced in Muirhead, Life of James Watt (1859), ch. VI (same archive.org OCR volume) -- FIRSTHAND account by Watt's friend and the Glasgow professor of chemistry, also prepared c.1796 for the patent litigation (interested, from memory). Different author from Robison; both were reproduced by the same editor.
- Watt's own narrative in his 'Notes on Robison' (History of the steam engine, c.1814), as reproduced in Muirhead, Life of James Watt (1859), ch. VII, first part read (c.1759-64: the Papin-digester experiments, the college model, the flask measurements) -- SELF-AUTHORED (one perspective, together with Watt's letters quoted by Smiles); used only where flagged self and never as the sole support for a row.
- Frederick J. Bramwell, 'Watt, James (1736-1819)', Dictionary of National Biography vol. 60 (1899), Wikisource text -- independent secondary biography by a consulting engineer who had read the Boulton-Watt correspondence held by the Tangye family; critical in places (the crank/sun-and-planet passage, the patent specification, the 'inventor' misconception). Fetched via the Wikisource API and read in full.
- George Selgin and John L. Turner, 'Strong Steam, Weak Patents, or, the Myth of Watt's Innovation-Blocking Monopoly, Exploded' (working paper, 8 April 2009; published Journal of Law and Economics 54(4), 2011), PDF downloaded and read in full -- independent scholarly (economic-history) article that reviews Watt's patents, the Bull and Hornblower/Maberley suits and his attitude to high-pressure steam; it argues a thesis (that the patent did not block high-pressure steam), so factual statements are used sparingly and its interpretive claims are not relied on.
- Henry Brougham, Lives of Men of Letters and Science who flourished in the time of George III, vol. 1 (London, 1845), chapter 'Watt' (pp. 352-365 and 400-401 read), archive.org OCR text -- independent secondary sketch by a contemporary lawyer and politician who says he knew Watt; largely derived from Robison, Muirhead and Arago, so treated as weakly independent and used only for the organ episode and for Arago's judgment of Watt's drawings. The middle of the chapter (the water-composition controversy) was not read.
