

Edward Scriven (1775-1841), line engraving after Godfrey Kneller (1711 portrait), dated 1827 in the Wellcome catalogue (no imprint or publisher on the sheet or in the record); digital image Wellcome Collection, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; cropped to the plate and saved as JPEG at q85 (no upscaling) · Wellcome Collection, Iconographic Collections (V0006656EL; Library reference ICV No 6871L): line engraving by Edward Scriven after Godfrey Kneller's 1711 portrait, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0 (Wellcome digitization); engraving public domain
Trait Constellation
Key Achievements
The Royal Society's minutes show Wren bringing work in several fields in the early 1660s: a letter on his hypothesis about Saturn, dated 1 October 1661, and a description of a weather-clock registered on 9 December 1663. On 1 February 1665 he presented observations of the comet of 1664-65 with a theory, and his surviving diagram works out the comet's path by a geometric construction.
On 29 April 1663 Wren showed the Royal Society his model of the theatre to be built at Oxford and was asked to write out a description of its whole frame for the Society's archives. Evelyn's diary records that the theatre's opening ceremony took place on 9 July 1669.
Wren was appointed surveyor-general of the repairs of St Paul's on 30 July 1669, and in the same year became Surveyor-General of the King's Works, a post from which he was dismissed in 1718. The king approved the Warrant design for a new cathedral on 14 May 1675, and five days later the commissioners ordered work to begin on the foundations of its eastern part; Geraghty concludes that by 18 June, when the first contracts were signed, Wren had already reworked the plan of the choir and crossing.
Moments That Reveal Them
On 27 August 1666, six days before the Great Fire began, Wren joined Evelyn, the Bishop of London and others to survey Old St Paul's. Evelyn's diary says that he and Wren, against Chicheley and Pratt, who thought the nave's outward lean original, plumbed the uprights in several places and insisted that the steeple needed a new foundation; after 'much contest' their offer to bring in a plan and estimate for a domed church was accepted.
Taking plumb-line measurements at several points while contesting colleagues' reading of the lean is consistent with the profile's analytical-rigor score; the account comes from Evelyn, a friend who took part in the survey, so it is a single, friendly perspective. Analytical Rigour
Within days of the Great Fire, Wren drew a scheme for replanning the City, which was shown to Charles II by 10 or 11 September 1666 (scholars differ by a day); it survives in two versions at All Souls College, and Hebbert says it came with a written description. Evelyn presented his own plan on 13 September, and Henry Oldenburg reported that the King showed much approbation, but Wren's streets did not follow existing alignments and the scheme would have required redefining property titles; it was not adopted, and the City was rebuilt largely on its old lines under the Rebuilding Act signed on 8 February 1667.
How quickly he responded sits alongside the profile's proactive-agency score, though nothing shows whether the plan was requested and its mismatch with existing property lines keeps this a tentative reading. Proactive Agency
Turning Points
In 1666 Hebbert describes Wren as still Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, with early success in mathematics and astronomy behind him. On 30 July 1669 he was appointed surveyor-general of the repairs of St Paul's, and Geraghty gives 1669 as the year he became Surveyor-General of the King's Works, whose office he then headed for about fifty years.
A move from astronomy and experiment to a building career is consistent with the profile's cross-domain-range score; Geraghty argues that his experimental training shaped his draughtsmanship, but the sources do not say why he changed course. Cross-Domain Range
Similar People
People whose overall profiles resemble theirs.


Benjamin Franklin

Maya Angelou

Ibn Khaldun

Abraham Lincoln

Pablo Picasso
Sources
- Christopher Wren (English Wikipedia; lead section fetched via the MediaWiki API) -- orientation only (identity, dates, occupations); not used as support for any scored row.
- ko.wikipedia.org '크리스토퍼 렌' (intro extract fetched via the MediaWiki API) -- confirms the Korean name form; orientation only.
- Christopher Wren (Q170373) -- identity verified live through the Wikidata API (wbgetentities: labels, descriptions, claims): en label 'Christopher Wren', description 'English architect (1632-1723)', ko label '크리스토퍼 렌', born 1632-10-20 (Julian), died 1723 (25 Feb / 8 Mar calendar variants; only the year is used), P18 'Christopher Wren by Godfrey Kneller 1711.jpg'. Orientation only.
- The Diary of John Evelyn (2 vols., M. Walter Dunne, 1901; archive.org OCR full text, vol. 1 covering 1620-64 and vol. 2 covering 1665-1706, downloaded and searched locally; every Wren passage found was read in context) -- FIRSTHAND account by a close friend and fellow Royal Society member (friendly source, one perspective). Wren entries read: 11 Jul 1654, Oct 1664, 27 Aug 1666, 19 Feb 1671, 25 May 1682, 15 and 23 Feb 1684, 4 and 30 Jun 1696, 9 Jun 1698, among others. The 1901 text is a modernised edition and some of its dates (for example a Royal Society presidency entry) are not relied on.
- John Aubrey, 'Brief Lives', chiefly of contemporaries, ed. Andrew Clark (Oxford, 1898), vols. 1-2, archive.org OCR full text searched locally -- the 'Sir Christopher Wren' entry (vol. 2, pp. 311-13, including Clark's notes) and the Wren passages in the lives of Francis Potter, John Wallis, Denham and Holder. Aubrey was Wren's friend and sometime petitioner for his patronage (friendly, partly hearsay; one perspective).
- Thomas Birch, The History of the Royal Society of London (1756-57), vols. 1-2: printed minutes and papers of the Society's weekly meetings, 1660-70. Vol. 1 (Google-scanned copy, archive.org OCR) and vol. 2 (archive.org OCR, noisier) downloaded and searched locally for Wren; the meeting entries cited were read in context and their dates checked against the surrounding text. Institutional record compiled by the Society's secretary from its journal books (Wren was himself a member; no other affiliation).
- R. T. Gunther, Early Science in Oxford, vol. X (Oxford, 1935): the Preface (pp. xxxiii-xxxvi) quoting M. I. Batten's Times article of 14 Feb 1935 on Hooke's Guildhall diary of 1672-80 and Wren's City-church work, plus Hooke's diary of 1688-93 (Wren entries); and vol. VII (1930), passages on the College of Physicians and Hooke's diary. Hooke's diary is FIRSTHAND but Hooke was an interested colleague, and Gunther and Batten are Hooke partisans (secondary; one perspective, read for Hooke's dated entries only). Hooke's 1672-80 diary itself (Guildhall) was not opened.
- Anthony Geraghty, The Architectural Drawings of Sir Christopher Wren at All Souls College, Oxford (online catalogue, All Souls College Library; print catalogue with English Heritage, AHRC and British Academy support) -- independent scholarly catalogue that cites primary records (St Paul's works accounts, Commissioners' minutes, Hooke's diary, Wren's letters). Pages read: 'The drawings: technique and purpose', Sheldonian, pre-fire design, revision to the pre-fire design, new cathedral (c.1668), Greek Cross, Great Model studies, Great Model to Warrant, Warrant design, Penultimate, Revised, equal-armed and round cathedral designs, the 1666 London plan, the 1664 comet, meteorological and surveying instruments, refraction, theatre designs and the Monument. Wren's own letters are quoted through this catalogue (self-authored, counted as one self perspective). Where it repeats Parentalia (compiled by Wren's son, published by his grandson, 1750) that is flagged as a family source and not used to support any row.
- Michael Hebbert (Bartlett School of Planning, UCL), 'The long after-life of Christopher Wren's short-lived London plan of 1666', Planning Perspectives (2019), author's original manuscript PDF downloaded and read through the account of Wren's plan, its reception and the Parentalia legend (about the first 470 of 1,100 lines; the nineteenth- and twentieth-century reception sections were not read) -- independent peer-reviewed scholarship citing Oldenburg's letters, Evelyn and the Wren Society volumes; it also reports the editors of the 1934 Wren Society reprint calling Parentalia of 'doubtful authority'.
