마하트마 간디
93% 프로필 일치도
Photo: Nadar (Felix Tournachon), 1872-1876, Rijksmuseum RP-F-F80162, public domain, resized from the original · Wikimedia Commons file sourced from the Rijksmuseum: Woodburytype after a photograph by Nadar, 1872-1876, from the Galerie Contemporaine (1876); downscaled from 3028 x 3608 pixels to 1007 x 1200 with no cropping · Public domain
사업가 · 19세기
페르디낭 드 레셉스
1805–1894
주요 업적 분야
공학창업역사
아직 성격 매칭에 포함되지 않았습니다 — 기록된 근거가 성격 모델 전체를 다루기에는 충분하지 않습니다. 이 페이지의 다른 모든 내용은 자유롭게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
핵심 특성
주요 업적
1854년 사이드 파샤에게서 운하 특허를 얻어 수에즈 운하 건설 회사를 이끌었고, 약 160km 길이의 수평식 운하가 1869년 11월 17일 개통되었다.
공개 모집으로 자금을 마련해, 1858년 주식 공모에서 주로 프랑스인인 약 2만 명의 투자자에게서 대형 은행의 지원 없이 1억 프랑을 모았다.
1879년부터 프랑스 파나마 운하 회사를 이끌며 수평식 운하안을 지지했으나 회사는 1888~89년에 파산·청산되었고, 운하는 훗날 미국의 관할 아래 완공되었다.
삶의 장면들
1855년 오스만 조정과 팔머스턴 총리가 수에즈 계획을 지지하지 않자 그는 영국 상공회의소들을 찾아 호소했고, 1858년 주식 공모로 약 2만 명의 투자자에게서 1억 프랑을 모았다.
이는 공식적 거절에 맞서 대중에게 직접 호소한 사람의 모습과 일치한다. 설득력
1879년 파리 회의에서 프랑스의 한 고위 기술자가 수평식 파나마 운하를 비현실적이라고 했지만, 굴착 4년째인 1886년 두 번째 방문에서도 그는 여전히 수평식 운하여야 한다고 고집했다.
이는 전문가의 반대와 초기 결과에도 불구하고 선택한 계획을 고수하는 모습과 일치한다. 입장 수정 성향
전환점
1849년 외교관 생활을 접고 약 5년간 반쯤 은퇴해 지내던 그는 1854년 옛 친구 사이드가 총독이 되자 카이로로 가서 수에즈 운하 사업의 특허를 얻었다.
이는 좌절 뒤에 장기 사업을 맡으며 경력의 방향을 바꾼 모습과 일치한다. 끈기
비슷한 인물
전체적인 프로필이 이 사람과 닮은 사람들이에요.
출처
- Ferdinand de Lesseps (Q209169), verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-31): label 'Ferdinand de Lesseps', description 'French diplomat and entrepreneur, developer of the Suez Canal (1805-1894)', born 1805-11-19, died 1894-12-07, Korean label present. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Fondation Napoleon, biography 'Lesseps, Ferdinand de' (English edition), read in full: an institutional history of the Second Empire and its figures that traces how he obtained the 1854 concession from Said, failed to win Ottoman approval in 1855 and failed to persuade Palmerston, raised 100 million francs from about 20,000 investors in 1858 without major bank backing, replaced forced labour with European workers and machinery after the new Viceroy halted work in 1864, appealed to Napoleon III's arbitration, the 1869 opening, his 1884 election to the Academie francaise, and the Panama concession, failure and 1893 sentence. CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE: a historical foundation's standard biography. Written from the French imperial-history standpoint and sympathetic in tone.
- EBSCO Research Starters, 'Ferdinand de Lesseps', read in full: a scholarly-style encyclopedia biography noting that he was a career diplomat with no engineering training, that he returned to the Suez project in 1854 at the invitation of the Viceroy, that roughly half the capital came from French investors, the 1869 opening of the roughly 160 km sea-level canal, the 1879 Paris congress where he won over the audience while a senior French engineer warned of disease and rejected the sea-level design, and the Panama bankruptcy of 1889 with heavy loss of life; it is openly critical of the sea-level decision and cites the Cameron and Karabell books as more and less generous assessments. A single-author overview that does not describe the Panama trial outcomes.
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, eleventh edition (1911), entry 'Lesseps, Ferdinand de' (Wikisource transcription), read in full: dated career from vice-consul at Lisbon in 1825 through the 1854 concession, the 1856 international commission of engineers, the 1858 company with about 200 million francs of capital, the first pickaxe blow at Port Said on 25 April 1859 and the opening on 17 November 1869, his later projects, and the Panama venture he undertook at 74 and insisted on building without locks despite objections, wound up in December 1888 with the prosecution of him and his son. Period reference work (early 20th century) with an admiring tone; used for dates and outline.
- Grace's Guide to British Industrial History, 'Ferdinand de Lesseps' (reproducing a 1895 obituary and later notes), read in full: records that Palmerston called the scheme a bubble, that he toured Britain (reportedly 32 meetings in 45 days), that he relied on persuasion and publicity while the engineering was done largely by others (Linant Bey, Mougel Bey, independent commissions), contemporary judgments including John Hawkshaw's 1863 report and Gambetta's 'Le Grand Francais', Suez traffic rising from 486 vessels in 1870 to 3,389 in 1890, and the Panama estimate of 658 million francs and eight years, the 1888 bankruptcy and the trial; it states that the obituary and the main article disagree on whether the sentence was served or overturned. British engineering-heritage source, partly period obituary text.
- History.com (A&E Television Networks), '7 Fascinating Facts About the Panama Canal', read in full: popular-history article stating that he intended a sea-level canal like Suez, that excavation proved far harder than expected, that Gustave Eiffel was later hired to design locks, that the French attempts caused more than 20,000 deaths, that the company went bankrupt in 1889 after investing more than 260 million dollars, and that he, his son and others were convicted in 1893 with sentences later overturned. General-audience summary; used only for the outline of the failure.
- Linda Hall Library digital exhibition 'The Land Divided, The World United', pages 'The French Plan' and 'The French Attempt', both read in full: a science and engineering library's account of the 1879 Paris congress where the sea-level plan he endorsed was approved, the objection of the chief engineer of the French Department of Bridges and Highways that a sea-level plan was completely unrealistic (he proposed locks and lakes), the statement that on his second visit in 1886 he continued to insist on a sea-level canal, and the 1889 liquidation. Independent institutional source; says little about his personal conduct and nothing about the 1887 lock decision.
- Rijksmuseum, 'Portret van Ferdinand de Lesseps' (object RP-F-F80162): Woodburytype after a photograph by Nadar, 1872-1876, from the Galerie Contemporaine (1876); the museum page gives the copyright status as Public domain (Public Domain Mark 1.0). Used only for the portrait record; not used as support for any row.