

Photo: Wolfgang Jekel, London Chess Classic 2016, CC BY 2.0, resized from the original · Wikimedia Commons file from Wolfgang Jekel's Flickr photo of the London Chess Classic 2016, checked against the live Flickr page; downscaled from 4256 x 2832 pixels to 1200 x 798 with no cropping · CC BY 2.0
운동선수 · 현대
비스와나탄 아난드
b. 1969
주요 업적 분야
아직 성격 매칭에 포함되지 않았습니다 — 기록된 근거가 성격 모델 전체를 다루기에는 충분하지 않습니다. 이 페이지의 다른 모든 내용은 자유롭게 확인하실 수 있습니다.
핵심 특성
주요 업적
2000년 FIDE 세계선수권을 차지하고 2007년 통합 세계 챔피언이 된 뒤 크람니크(2008), 토팔로프(2010), 겔판트(2012)를 상대로 타이틀을 지켰으며 2013년 마그누스 칼센에게 타이틀을 내주었다.
1988년 그랜드마스터가 되어 1990년부터 국제 무대의 주요 선수로 활약했고, 체스베이스는 그가 약 25년간 인도를 세계 체스의 정상권에 있게 했다고 평가한다.
2013년 타이틀을 잃은 뒤 44세에 2014년 후보자 토너먼트에서 우승해 소치에서 칼센과 다시 맞붙었고, 2020년 12월부터 젊은 인도 선수들을 위한 웨스트브리지 아난드 체스 아카데미의 수석 멘토를 맡고 있다.
삶의 장면들
2013년 칼센과의 타이틀 매치에서 체스베이스의 한 회고 글은 그가 이점을 얻지 못한 채 1.e4를 고집하다가 9국에 이르러서야 1.d4로 바꿨다고 전한다.
이는 한 해설가의 평가에 따르면 압박 속에서 방향 전환이 더뎠던 접근과 일치한다. 적응력
2022년 올림피아드에서 구케시가 한 판을 패하자 아난드는 언제 멈춰야 하는지에 관한 자신의 대국 사례를 들려주었고, 아카데미 선수 한 명 한 명에 대해 분기별 보고서를 쓴다.
이는 젊은 선수들을 키우려는 꾸준하고 실질적인 노력과 일치한다. 영향 창출 동기
전환점
2013년 11월 첸나이에서 칼센에게 세계 타이틀을 내준 뒤 비평가들은 그가 너무 소극적이고 나이가 많다고 했지만, 그는 2014년 후보자 토너먼트에 나서 한 라운드를 남기고 무패로 우승했다.
이는 공개적으로 큰 패배를 당한 뒤에도 정상으로 돌아오는 능력과 일치한다. 끈기
비슷한 인물
전체적인 프로필이 이 사람과 닮은 사람들이에요.


말랄라 유사프자이

왕가리 마타이

루스 베이더 긴즈버그

공자

마르쿠스 아우렐리우스
출처
- Viswanathan Anand (Q45747), verified live via the Wikidata API (2026-10-31): label 'Viswanathan Anand', description 'Indian chess grandmaster', born 1969-12-11, no death date, Korean label present. Orientation only; not used as support for any row.
- Store norske leksikon (Norwegian national encyclopedia), 'Viswanathan Anand', read in full: an independent encyclopedia biography giving his 1988 grandmaster title, the 1995 world championship match lost to Kasparov, the 2000 FIDE title, the 2007 undisputed title, defences against Kramnik (2008), Topalov (2010) and Gelfand (2012), the 2013 loss to Carlsen in Chennai, the 2014 Candidates win and Sochi rematch loss, his rapid titles, the 'Tiger from Madras' nickname for his fast play and clock use, and a style that became more positional as champion. CANONICAL SIGNIFICANCE SOURCE: a national encyclopedia entry. Concise and favourable; the page itself is in Norwegian and was read in translation.
- ChessBase, 'Chennai Final: Magnus Victorious' (November 2013), read in full: the chess-news site's report that Carlsen beat Anand 6.5-3.5 and that Anand was outclassed, a game-10 blunder by each player, Anand's own post-match remarks (disappointed with his level of play, game 5 decisive, will play the next Candidates) and the report's credit to him for keeping India at the top of world chess for about 25 years. Specialist press; the writers are chess professionals and fans, and Anand's quotes are his own statements.
- ChessBase, 'Chennai 03: How bad was it?' (November 2013), read in full: grandmaster commentary on the third game of the 2013 match, saying he was well prepared and outplayed Carlsen for long stretches (answering with an unexpected novelty) but 'missed his chance' and then threw away the advantage at move 37; includes the reporters' balanced view that the game showed a real contest. Contemporaneous match commentary; several named writers.
- ChessBase, 'Reliving the World Championship 2013, part two' (Sagar Shah), read in full: a retrospective in which the author says Anand missed a draw in game five, kept playing 1.e4 without getting an advantage and switched to 1.d4 only in game nine, and concludes that sticking with 1.e4 too long contributed to his defeat; all evaluations are the single author's, and no preparation detail is given. A critical, single-author retrospective.
- Lubomir Kavalek, 'Anand proved them wrong' (ChessBase, 1 April 2014), read in full: a grandmaster's column reporting that after the 2013 loss critics called his play too timid and said he was too old for the Candidates, then that Anand, then 44, won the tournament undefeated with a round to spare, 'showed a steady hand', played practically and avoided unnecessary risk while still able to play sharply; includes a game annotation and a closing question whether too much is demanded of top players. Admiring in tone, but written by an independent grandmaster and including the critics' view.
- FIDE (World Chess Federation), 'Viswanathan Anand is the winner of Candidates Tournament' (April 2014), read in full: the federation's report that he won the Khanty-Mansiysk Candidates with 8.5 of 14 points, clinched first place a round early after a draw with Karjakin, and earned a title match with Carlsen; it records that he received an award at the closing ceremony and played an exhibition game with a 12-year-old. Federation news release, factual and favourable.
- ChessBase, 'How Vishy Anand is supporting young super talents of India through WACA', read in full: a feature on the WestBridge Anand Chess Academy launched in December 2020 in partnership with an investment firm, saying he is its chief mentor, set targets and quarterly written reports for each young player, advised the youngest player Gukesh after a loss at the 2022 Olympiad, helped prepare Praggnanandhaa for a 2022 tournament, and brought in outside trainers. Much of the account is in Anand's own words and the academy's own framing, so it is partly self-affiliated.
- The Week (India), 'World championship chapter is over for me' (interview with Viswanathan Anand, July 2022), read in full: a first-person magazine interview in which he says he is closing the door on the world championship, that he works from a home study and blocks out days for chess, that his mentoring classes sit alongside the players' own trainers, and that he accepted an invitation to join the FIDE president's team. Self-report; used only for context and never as sole support for any row; the personal remarks in it were not used.
